African universities and financial institutions haven’t done much to correct the negative perception and discourse about African mass markets and informality. An economic landscape in which smallholder farmers, artisans and traders have nurtured self-sufficient communities for decades cannot continue to be called informal and inferior. By now, African universities should have studied how these secondary economies enable survival and wealth accumulation in non-conventional spaces and family enterprises. If they were curious enough, African academics and bankers would have developed relevant methods for including sterling work by smallholder farmers, traders and MSMEs into gross domestic product calculations. That would have built pathways for allocating state resources and other forms of support to this important but under-appreciated economy.
Symbols of local economic resilience
Despite neglect and exclusion from the dominant economic paradigm, smallholder farmers and mass markets continue to epitomize resilience. Their resilience is reflected in their ability to stay afloat during shocks like COVID19, droughts and in environments characterized by local and multinational corporate competition. The political and economic elites continue to use their influence in favor of foreign direct investment through subsidies and policy biases. Without similar support, mass market actors have resorted to African values and norms to hone indigenous commercial excellence. By holding onto alternative modes of production, based on indigenous traditions, practices and notions of place, informal economies are preventing the expansion of western forms of capitalism.
As part of understanding informal economies, academic institutions and bankers should be refining and repackaging supply chains that have been operating informally for decades without support from government and development agencies. The fact that many investments have been made in many African communities in a fragmented manner continues to undermine development as several projects either work in siloes or they fold without sharing critical lessons. Knitting, refining and packaging most of these initiatives can go a long way in advancing inclusive development.
The value of coordinating research to understand consumer tastes and preferences
Through investment in research, colleges and universities should be able to stay up to date with domestic and foreign markets as well as using literature review to keep the local industry current. Eventually they should be able to upgrade their curricula so that it stays fluid and up to date with the informal economy in order to influence policy. One major challenge across Africa is that research institutes are not adequately coordinated. Their collaborations are ad hoc and designed for media attention only especially through trade fairs, agricultural shows and science symposia. If a quarter of products exhibited at these events were commercialized and availed to masses of African consumers, industrialization would have gained a lot of ground in many African countries.
A key research theme that has been ignored by African universities and research institutions is about changing consumer tastes and preferences. Unless food commodities produced by smallholder farmers and traded by traders in territorial markets match changing consumer tastes and preferences, imports will continue to influence consumption patterns. Instead of spending a lot of money importing finished products, knowledge, seed and other inputs, investing in local research will enable African countries to not only save money but also direct resources toward home-grown solutions. For instance, with more than 20 universities and research institutions, countries like Zimbabwe would, by now, have stopped importing knowledge and other inputs and relying on home-grown solutions. Long-term finance should also be extended to private research with government playing a regulatory role. This is because private research is good at attracting top talent and passionate results-oriented researchers.
How can financial inclusion be achieved if banks don’t understand the informal economy?
Financial inclusion will remain a buzzword and very difficult to achieve if formal banks do not invest in understanding the informal economy. In fact, limited interest by formal banks to understand the informal economy has fueled the growth of the secondary or underground economy. As if that is not enough, the formal economy data underestimates the contribution of the underground economy. If the informal economy constitutes 60% of cash in circulation for day-to-day transaction, every USD100 in the secondary economy purchases commodities worth USD1000 (ten times). That means the role of money in driving the economy is more pronounced in the secondary economy than formal economy.
When some of the cash is kept in safes by formal institutions, that leads to inflationary tendencies because cash that should be oiling the economy will be lying idle. Holding depositors’ money in the bank withdraws that money from circulation. That money should be earning more for the depositor if brought into circulation through mass markets, not through loans as is done by banks. The high activity in mass markets keeps the money in commodities, enabling money to play its role as a medium of exchange. On the contrary, when money is kept in safe, it ceases to be a medium of exchange. A farmer with USD100 000 worth of commodities needs a buyer who needs that money to buy those commodities and holding that money in the bank means the farmer will be stuck with commodities.
By holding cash in the bank, formal banks are failing to see how they are slowing down the pace of economic development through systems that exclude active participants who should be using cash. Formal financial institutions have gone to the extent of valuing companies which they see as more secure but how many companies have failed to repay debts to banks? Some banks have even gone under liquidation but mass markets, the informal economy and the MSMEs have survived for decades. The collective collateral value of mass markets and MSMEs is worth billions of dollars but banks have been reluctant to recognize that collateral value. That is why mass markets and the informal economy have become closed economies that trust their own systems.
Charles@knowledgetransafrica.com / charles@emkambo.co.zw /
Website: www.emkambo.co.zw / www.knowledgetransafrica.com
Mobile: 0772 137 717/ 0774 430 309/0712737430